The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte denied the manufacturers' motion for a new trial.
Here is a link to the 30+ pages:
Order
Here is the good part (without cite):
To be sure, errors must be considered cumulatively in deciding whether a trial was more likely than not tainted by error. The Manufacturers have ascribed error to a variety of rulings, but the court finds none, let alone any prejudicial errors. The trial was lengthy and complex with a multitude of issues raised by the parties. The court finds that the trial was fair and the result was not against the clear weight of the evidence. Accordingly, the motion for a new trial is denied.
Thursday, July 24, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
It is indeed, a Thing of Beauty!!!
Wahooooooooo
The1stBA
Post a Comment