I do not believe that any evidence currently exists that can substantiate the allegations of conspiracy to murder; there was no conspiracy and there was no cover-up.
The Stevens report concludes Princess Diana's death was a "tragic accident." I disagree . . . when a driver is roaring drunk and driving at excessive speed, death is no "accident."
Troubling is the fact that the U.S. was recording Diana's conversations and once this was known, the collective shrugging of American shoulders. What legitmate U.S. security interest necessiated invading her privacy? More than likely, the bugging was the result of prurient curiosity.
The Operation Paget inquiry report into the allegation of conspiracy to murder linked here - Overview (9 pages) or Full Report (871 pages).
The Stevens report concludes Princess Diana's death was a "tragic accident." I disagree . . . when a driver is roaring drunk and driving at excessive speed, death is no "accident."
Troubling is the fact that the U.S. was recording Diana's conversations and once this was known, the collective shrugging of American shoulders. What legitmate U.S. security interest necessiated invading her privacy? More than likely, the bugging was the result of prurient curiosity.
The Operation Paget inquiry report into the allegation of conspiracy to murder linked here - Overview (9 pages) or Full Report (871 pages).
1 comment:
"Troubling is the fact that the U.S. was recording Diana's conversations and once this was known, the collective shrugging of American shoulders."
http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/Diana_Study.pdf
Chapter 15 seems to indicate that that's as unsubstantiated a claim as "rambus invented Double Data Rate signalling".
Post a Comment