Empiricum replies again

Responding to my repartee, "s110572" asserted:

*** What I did was articulate your unspoken assertions. "Heritage" would equate to Mr. Sofaer having a birthright to the "power structure" and that structure's media access. A birthright to media access can accurately be characterized as influence. And I guess charisma is another birthright handed down to Mr. Sofaer. He is a fortunate person indeed. Seems your ancestors were absent when they were handing out lucky breaks. You try to compensate, but all that bile blocks your way. Work harder, speak less.Your attempt to disguise a racist political agenda is a failure. One need only peer intently between the lines.

***My rejoinder on the above is that "articulating unspoken assertions" is not a good debating style or practice. Your mind works on wrong assumptions and by doing so you could easily be accused, as I hereby accuse you, of putting words into my mouth. Now I have to spew back your bile and racist words onto your plate. Bon appetit! Let me add also that I am just thrilled to note that you apparently do not belong to the Pat Buchanan School of Debating as you do not interject a sneer or a sarcastic laugh in between your sentences. I thank you for that. And lastly, I welcome you to the world of Empiricum --- a world of enlightenment and intelligent debating on any topic under the sun!

Sincerely,

EMPIRICUM